To pretend the wide availability of a commodity or service when
in fact access to the item in question is severely restricted can be deadly as
the Noble laureate Amartya Sen has clearly demonstrated in his classic “Poverty and Famines”. Ever since the world no longer views famine and hunger as an
outcome of crop failures as used to be the case but in most likelihood as a
lack of access to food since it has been demonstrated that most such episodes
are often accompanied by major obstacles erected by the social and economic
systems. This is not much different than to claim that prenatal care is abundant
for anyone that can afford, say, the $300 fee per visit.
Unfortunately, the above principle of pure discrimination
and deception has evolved to become the bedrock on which the Lebanese political
system and Lebanese cabinet operate. It often appears as if citizenship, in
Lebanon, does not carry any intrinsic rights, just the opposite what is
important is who do you know and how much can you afford to pay as a bribe.
Nothing gets done without “wasta”.
The latest iteration of this form of deception, which has
become elevated to become an art, is the latest development regarding the
ongoing discussions on possible reforms to the current rotten electoral system.
One idea, that has met universal support, is the plan to allow the Lebanese
expatriates to participate in the upcoming parliamentary elections next
year. So many countries have offered
their expatriates the right to vote that this issue has become taken for
granted all over the world. But things are never what they appear in Lebanon.
What appears to be real is often an image of a distorted reality. This statute
is no different.
To get a clear understanding of what Lebanese officialdom is
offering imagine, if you will, an area of land that is as large as a combination
of Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority. Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar,
Bahrain, UAE, Oman, Yemen and Saudi Arabia then multiply that area by 2.5. The result of that exercise would be the area
of the United States of America. The Lebanese government is proposing that all
the Lebanese citizens living in the US; let us assume for the sake of this
exercise that they number 100,000 strong; have the right to participate in the upcoming
elections provided they can make an appearance in person at one of four places
only, either the Lebanese embassy in DC or one of the Lebanese consulates in
NYC, Detroit or Los Angeles. Does anyone really expect those that live beyond
say 20 miles of the embassy to even consider taking place in this process? What
the Lebanese government has essentially done is to perfect the game of pretending
to offer a service without actually doing so
The Lebanese cabinet, including the Lebanese President, who
was unconstitutionally elected need to be reminded of the simplest and most
essential principle in a democracy; the right to vote is inherent, it is
intrinsic and cannot be alienated from the citizen. A citizen MUST have access
to the vote under any set of circumstances and government has to put into practice
a system that honours the idea the franchise is the lifeblood of democracy and government,
at all levels, is obligated to provide access to that service that is totally
equal and that is unencumbered. Anything less should be grounds to civil
disobedience on a massive scale especially when the solution is simple elegant
and inexpensive. If the mail can be trusted for registration then why cannot we
trust it for casting a ballot? And the pretence goes on and on.
1 comment:
The same logic mentioned above applies to Canada, Australia, Brazil and all other countries.
Post a Comment