The idea of a minimum wage has a great appeal all over the
world. Although the notion was first introduced by New Zealand in 1894
practically all countries in the world have adopted a minimum wage standard. Since
each of these countries has attained its own unique mix of social and economic
development then each country has used its own rationale while setting these wages.
Yet probably most such statutory wages share a common concern about reducing
poverty and promoting fair equity.
Lebanon has been struggling for a while to set up an
adjustment to its current level of minimum wages but to no avail. The last
three tries have failed and a fourth one is expected to be announced sometime
this week. The need for an adjustment in the level of monthly earnings in
Lebanon has become increasingly urgent as the cost of living; especially the
major components of housing and food have outpaced any wage gains. The result
can very easily be observed in the high poverty rate. A recent study concluded
that 28 % of Lebanese households live below the poverty line of $4 per day.
Since equality in pay leads to an equality in income then
why not guarantee a wage level that will compensate each labourer a level of
earnings that is close to the per capita
income. As incredible as this idea might sound it is in essence the goal of
Charbal Nahas, the Labour Minister, who proposed a level of compensation that
will allow the least skilled among us to earn close to 75% of the Lebanese per
capita income. Such a policy ,if adopted, would prove to be very misguided . Superficially
such policies tend to enjoy wide organized labour support since they aim to narrow
the pay differential between the skilled and the unskilled. Unfortunately such
policies will also discourage investments in education and enhanced
productivity. The higher is the proportion of GDP that is guaranteed by minimum
wage legislation then the smaller is the premium for investing in human capital.
So what sort of a guideline should one follow in setting a
minimum wage? Allow me to suggest that an effective minimum wage policy should
be set in such a way as (1) not to discourage the pursuit and acquisition of
higher skills and (2) ensure that the reward of employment is the attainment of
a living standard that is above poverty. The concern with (2) is often referred
to as a “living wage”.
Given that the
current Lebanese per capita income is around $10,000 per annum then the first
criteria above; encourage acquisition of high skills; should be in the range of
45%-55% of GDP per capita. That implies an annual minimum wage of $4500-$5500 or
$375-$458 per month. The second criterion is even more problematic since the
actual cost of living differs substantially from one region to the next. There
is no doubt that living in Beirut or its direct environs is financially more
demanding than living in the Bekaa, Akar or the south. But since the custom is
to set up a uniform minimum wage for the whole country and since the currently acceptable poverty line in
Lebanon is that of $4 per day then a family unit of four individuals would be
able to escape poverty with a monthly income of $480.
Based on the above rough computations we can conclude that
the Lebanese minimum wage should not be set above 700,000 LL per month. This level of income would allow a family of four
to escape poverty especially if the main wage earner is to get some assistance
from his/her spouse. Anything above this level will start to become counterproductive
and will affect adversely industries that are dependent on unskilled labour. A
high minimum wage might make Lebanese agricultural produce much less
competitive.
And last but not least we should caution that the pursuit of
social justice is an honorable goal but as in everything else good intensions are
not sufficient to bear fruit, they must be accompanied by the proper productive
tools. Minimum wages are only one tool in the fight against inequality and
poverty, a tool that must not be abused.
No comments:
Post a Comment